Prediction of Sarah Palfrey Cooke vs Eleanor Purdy Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Palfrey Cooke vs E. Purdy

Sarah Palfrey Cooke

USA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

113

Age

105

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Eleanor Purdy

USA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

113

Age

105

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Cooke 3 - 0 Purdy

They have played 4 sets in total, with Sarah Palfrey Cooke winning 4 and Eleanor Purdy winning 0. The last match between Sarah Palfrey Cooke and Eleanor Purdy was at the Brookline, 13-08-1945, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Sarah Palfrey Cooke getting the victory 6-0 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Cooke	3
Purdy	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R4) Brookline(08-13-45)

Stats

Sarah Palfrey Cooke

Eleanor Purdy

() Los Angeles SoCal Chps(05-12-45)

Stats

Sarah Palfrey Cooke

Eleanor Purdy

(SF) Los Angeles Mid-Winter(12-30-44)

Stats

Sarah Palfrey Cooke

Eleanor Purdy

S. P. Cooke vs E. Purdy H2H Profile

S. P. Cooke	Stats	E. Purdy
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
78.57% (429-117)	Career Total W/L	56.48% (109-84)
1	Grass	0
2	Hard	0
2	Titles	0
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. P. Cooke vs E. Purdy Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sarah Palfrey Cooke has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Eleanor Purdy has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sarah Palfrey Cooke, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eleanor Purdy has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Sarah Palfrey Cooke has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eleanor Purdy has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Sarah Palfrey Cooke has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Eleanor Purdy winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Sarah Palfrey Cooke has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 86% (W/L 67/11), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 70% (W/L 31/13). Eleanor Purdy has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 86% (W/L 34/16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 25/29).
Player level: In the last year, Sarah Palfrey Cooke has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Eleanor Purdy has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Sarah Palfrey Cooke winning 2 times and Eleanor Purdy being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Sarah Palfrey Cooke winning 4 and Eleanor Purdy winning 0.
The last match between Sarah Palfrey Cooke and Eleanor Purdy was at the Brookline, 13-08-1945, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Sarah Palfrey Cooke getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sarah Palfrey Cooke has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Eleanor Purdy has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sarah Palfrey Cooke has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eleanor Purdy has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Sarah Palfrey Cooke has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eleanor Purdy has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Sarah Palfrey Cooke vs Eleanor Purdy Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. P. Cooke vs E. Purdy H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. P. Cooke	Stats	E. Purdy
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
24	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

S. P. Cooke Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Munich Pro - 12-08-1947
Robin Pauline BetzP. Betz	L	9-Sep	Stats
Wembley Pro - 21-07-1947
Robin Pauline BetzP. Betz	W	6-1 3-6 6-3	Stats
Robin Pauline BetzP. Betz	L	UNK	Stats
US National Championships - 28-08-1945
R4 Jean DoyleJ. Doyle	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
Dodo CheneyD. Cheney	W	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

E. Purdy Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
US National Championships - 10-09-1948
R2 Nancy ChaffeeN. Chaffee	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Longwood Bowl - 23-08-1948
R3 Rosemary BuckR. Buck	W	7-5 6-0	Stats
Nancy ChaffeeN. Chaffee	L	0-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
Manchester-on-Sea - 16-08-1948
R3 Dorothy KnodeD. Knode	L	6-1 14-12	Stats
R2 Nancy LlonbergerN. Llonberger	W	W/O	Stats

View All

S. P. Cooke vs E. Purdy Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. P. Cooke	Stats	E. Purdy
78.57% (429/117)	YTD Win/Loss	56.48% (109/84)
74.91% (872/292)	Sets Win/Loss	54.84% (221/182)
100.00% (6423/0)	Games Win/Loss	52.24% (1910/1746)
78.00% (39/11)	Hard Win/Loss	54.55% (36/30)
85.90% (67/11)	Clay Win/Loss	68.00% (34/16)
76.19% (16/5)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
78.19% (276/77)	Grass Win/Loss	46.30% (25/29)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
72.84% (59/22)	Slam W/L	37.50% (3/5)
70.00% (7/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
79% (411/521)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (97/177)
59% (69/117)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (21/47)
94% (397/374)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (98/85)
6% (397/23)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (98/13)
30% (128/38)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (81/13)